As to the "intellectual" issue, a measured and sensible approach is in order. Woj is just being his usual bombthrowing self when he says that intellectuals made revolutions, with the workers as marionettes dancing at the end of their strings. If it were that easy we'd have had a revolution or ten by now. The workers do have a say in what happens, really a decisive one. If they stay home, all those string-holding intellectuals have an empty stage. But their ideas do shape the landscape and the terms of the fight when the workers do come out. Without them you get blind revolts. With them, of course, there are other risks, like thinking they are puppeteers and the workers are puppets to be manipulated.
--- Chris Doss <lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> --- Wojtek Sokolowski <swsokolowski at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > [WS:] He must have been smoking some really good
> > stuff. All revolutions were made by
> intellectuals:
> > Lenin, Trotsky, Mao, Fidel, Pol Pot... The proles
> > were just tools in their hands.
> >
> > Wojtek
> >
>
> Lots of uprisings in Russia were led by peasants and
> Cossacks (a subset of peasant). Does Emil Pugachev
> count as an intellectual? I doubt he knew how to
> read.
> (He wasn't very successful though.) Bogdan
> Khmelnitsy?
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000
> hotels
> in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your
> fit.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265