[lbo-talk] New York, New York! (was Chuck Hagel for President!)

Yoshie Furuhashi critical.montages at gmail.com
Fri Mar 23 10:24:34 PDT 2007


On 3/23/07, Jim Straub <rustbeltjacobin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hagel isn't electable tho. Most anti-war D's aren't willing to vote for
> another R for president.

The most intractable problem is that most liberals and leftists in the USA will never vote for anyone who is actually against the Iraq and Iran Wars, whether Chuck Hagel (R) or Dennis Kucinich (D) or Ralph Nader (I), in caucuses and primaries or general elections, on any party's ticket. :-0

On 3/23/07, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
> The only hope for withdrawal before that is to elect a rabid pro-war but
> intelligent candidate who will be able to cut his losses and get out.

John McCain has only hurt himself by his increasing emphasis on a rabid pro-war stance.

Polls at this point suggest that it is likely to be Rudy vs. HRC.

WH2008

Democratic Nomination: <http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08dem.htm> Republican Nomination: <http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08rep.htm> General Elections: <http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm>

At least six more years of war after war after war! -- Yoshie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list