[lbo-talk] Sociality and culture ( was bonobos)

Charles Brown cbrown at michiganlegal.org
Tue May 1 09:25:54 PDT 2007


 
 Jerry Monaco 

(4)  Kinship systems that are both extensive and symbolic or symbolized,
both in the present, across generations, and across life-times.  As far as I
know only modern humans have the capacity to recognize and represent this
kind of kinship system

For Charles only this last is a "real" kinship system.

^^^^
CB; Don't try to speak for me. I think missing link species are where
culture, language and kinship developed.  Missing link species are not
identical with chimps ( of course).

The cross and multiple generational dimensions of kinship are their
qualitative essence. They are the leap, the discontinuity that Godelier
finds absent.

^^^^^

By the way I am not making up this idea that we can analyze our nearest
cousins in terms of kinship systems. Maurice Godelier points out in his
critique of Levi-Strauss that chimpanzees and bonobos already live in
societies that exhibit constraints and processes of human kinship systems.
You might want to call it a simple kinship system.  Godelier is one of the
few Marxist anthropologists I know who actually pays attention to primate
studies.  The NLR reviewer of Godelier's book *_*Métamorphoses de la
parenté._
puts Godelier's conclusion as follows: "The passage from nature to culture
with *homo sapiens* thus cannot have been a sudden, discontinuous
transformation, but must have been more evolutionary in nature."  **

^^^^^^
CB; Well, yes, I have to listen to Godelier. 

As to the discontinuity, there is a discontinuity in the long run between
chimplike ancient species and humans. This is like Darwin noting that there
is an absence of "intermediate" species between the species he looks at. 









More information about the lbo-talk mailing list