> How about the racket of high-end academic publishers who solicit
> articles from professors, pay the authors little or nothing, then sell
> them back to the same institutions that funded the research for
> thousands of dollars? The professors have little choice but to go
> along with it, since their tenure and promotions rely upon publication
> in prestigious sources. And the institutions need the articles for
> their ongoing research.
>
> This scandal is one of the single biggest drags on academic
> librarianship. By way of example, the physics library at my alma
> mater, which was left unguarded 24 hours a day, contained a slim
> quarterly journal which cost $25,000 a year. I was always tempted to
> make the modest effort necessary to steal the collection, but
> refrained. (Scruples aside, what the hell would I have done with a
> stack of physics journals?)
>
> If anyone's interested in learning more about this disgracful
> situation, a Google search for "academic journal pricing crisis,"
> minus the quotation marks, will reveal a wealth of information.
>
> On 5/21/07, joanna <123hop at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Chuck wrote:
>>
>> > Don't get me started on how public libraries are using taxpayer money
>> to
>> >
>> >subsidize large publishers. The evil side of Harry Potter.
>> >
>> Get started. That's a very interesting topic. I would have guessed there
>> would be a conflict of interest...."publishers sell less because I can
>> get their books at the library...."
>>
>> Could you say more?
>>
>> Joanna
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>