[lbo-talk] labor bitchiness

joanna 123hop at comcast.net
Fri May 25 14:59:08 PDT 2007


I always thought that sentimentality was the cover needed when one was no longer able to feel love.

Joanna

BklynMagus wrote:


>>How does schlocky sentimentality breed reactionary
>>
>>
>politics (or vice versa)?
>
>When it comes to aesthetic uses, sentimentality is
>usually a clear sign of a reactionary posture.
>
>Rogders and Hart vs. Rodgers and Hammerstein
>
>Leo McCarey vs. Joseph L. Mankiewicz
>
>Sentimentality is invoked with regard to what has
>been lost and which must be recovered and preserved.
>The object itself is obscured: what is highlighted
>is emotional wave of sentimentality that is alleged
>to be a marker of value. Examination and critique
>are unwanted and discouraged.
>
>The reactionary impulse invokes sentimentality to
>bolster its legitimacy and power. How could anyone
>object to Mom and apple pie?
>
>Brian
>
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list