Incidentally, did you hear about the Liberty University student who was arrested for allegedly having multiple napalm-like bombs meant for protestors at Jerry Falwell's funeral? Three other suspects were being considered. http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3201543&page=1
Many people noticed that he wasn't called a suspected terrorist in that article...
> But Zoellick's specifically mentions ideological afiliations like
> socialism, anarchism, and the International, which is rarer to see
> these days.
I really suspect that many leaders understand anarchism. Maybe they hadn't read anything serious on it, but I keep hearing the word "anarchy" from them when they start considering some sufficiently serious form of democracy.
No kidding. A CEO was telling me about having a workplace where people made their own estimates. But of course it couldn't actually be democratic. "That's... anarchy!"
Damn straight.
Tayssir
-- Disclaimer: yes, I know that democracy may not be the best term to capture what people really mean when they say it. But critics of democracy rarely have any commitment in that direction.