[lbo-talk] get ready for Pres Clinton - again!

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Thu Nov 1 06:17:21 PDT 2007


[so just like we've got Bush 41 and 43, will we have Clinton 42 and 44?]

<http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1007/6644.html>

Clinton would cream Giuliani, poll finds
By: David Paul Kuhn
Oct 31, 2007 04:40 PM EST
Updated: November 1, 2007 09:03 AM EST

Republican popularity at its lowest level in a generation, huge study  
by Pew reveals.

One year before voters go to the polls to select the next president,  
the Republican Party is as weak as it has been in a generation, a  
detailed new poll suggests.

In a hypothetical match-up between Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani,  
bloc after bloc of traditionally Republican voters break for Clinton:

She wins the South.

She polls evenly with voters who attend church at least once a week.

She splits families with a household income above $100,000.

She loses rural voters and men — but only by a narrow margin.

All are constituencies Republicans have dominated for decades; George  
W. Bush won each by double-digit margins.

The findings from The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press  
remain preliminary, considering even the primaries are still two  
months off.

But Pew questioned an unusually large number of voters to try to  
paint the most accurate picture possible of where the presidential  
contest stands today.

Should the race continue down its current trajectory, the poll finds  
Clinton defeating Giuliani by eight percentage points.

Other recent polls, however, have placed Giuliani ahead of Clinton in  
a head-to-head race. But those polls predict Clinton would beat Fred  
Thompson, John McCain or Mitt Romney.


Frank's move ties lobbyists in knots
The angry voter: Bad news for Dems
The Congressional Compatibility Quiz
And Barack Obama would defeat Giuliani — though narrowly — according  
to at least four polls taken in October.

In fact, Democrats hold a marked advantage over Republicans in the  
eyes of voters.

In July 2004, the Democratic Party had a slight lead as the party  
“better able to manage the federal government” and as the party that  
is “more honest and ethical.”

Today Democrats lead both categories by double-digit margins.

By even larger margins, Democrats are seen as the party “more  
concerned about people like me” (by 29 percentage points) and the  
party best able to bring about “needed change” (by 22 percentage  
points).

Other polling has also showed that for the first time in decades  
Americans now see the two parties as equally qualified to face down  
national security threats — erasing the “security advantage”  
Republicans have long relied on.

Republican insiders dismiss the findings as “largely irrelevant”  
because they come so far before Election Day.

“I don’t take comfort in any of the numbers that are out there right  
now, but I also don’t put much stock in them because it is so  
premature,” said Rep. Adam Putnam (Fla.), the number-three Republican  
in the House.

Pew’s pollsters agree that as well as Democrats are positioned today,  
much could change in the next year.

t’s very early in the race, and we would all be shocked if the South  
went for Clinton,” said Michael Dimock, Pew’s associate director of  
research.

One factor the poll “reflects is the lack of focus among Republicans  
right now,” he said.

That lack of focus is visible when partisans are asked to rate their  
own political camp.

Only 36 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents  
say the GOP “does an excellent or good job” of “standing up for  
traditional GOP positions” on issues like reducing the size of  
government, cutting taxes, and promoting conservative social issues.

That’s a decline of 25 points since July 2004. In fact, it’s the  
lowest Republican rating for the GOP since Pew began tracking the  
issue in 2000.

If it turns out to be a subway race between Giuliani and Clinton, Pew  
further found that two-thirds of Republicans say their vote for the  
Republican would be more accurately described as a vote “against  
Clinton” and “not for Giuliani.”

Yet, as Dimock notes, “Republican enthusiasm and engagement could  
really turn and that’s the big unknown at this point.”

Democrats do not have a significantly better view of their party than  
Republicans do of the GOP, but Democrats have long been skeptical of  
their tribe.

Republicans, however, have become “increasingly negative,” as Pew  
puts it, about their party.

And they are falling behind in the party loyalty stakes, Pew  
interviews of some 20,000 Americans this year have found.

About a third of voters call themselves Democrats and a quarter call  
themselves Republicans — but when independents’ leanings are added to  
the mix, roughly half of Americans lean Democratic and only 36  
percent lean Republican.

That Democratic advantage in party identity is larger than at any  
time since tracking began in 1990.

Bush’s poor approval ratings are a factor.

His approval rating has dropped from around 50 percent in October  
2003 to about 30 percent today.

That is roughly equal to Jimmy Carter's ratings at the low point of  
the 1979 energy crisis and Richard Nixon's in the worst days of  
Watergate.

Additionally, the unpopular war in Iraq, the lack of a clear  
Republican front-runner and dismay among some conservatives about the  
authenticity of leading GOP candidates all play a role in the  
Democrats’ powerfully fortified position today.

Pew conducted its survey of 2,007 adults from Oct. 17 to Oct. 23. The  
sample size was nearly twice that of a normal poll.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list