how your sausage gets made Who Actually Attended The NSA's Secret Reporter Seminars? Last week, Josh Gerstein explained how the information control freaks at the National Security Agency conducted secret "seminars" for reporters—basically, little classes on how and when the government would like them to keep their mouths shut about top-secret and not-so- secret information. What's funny is that no one seems to remember the sessions, which went down at NSA headquarters between 2002 and 2004. Maureen Baginski, who was listed as a presenter at the seminars, said she had no recollection of being present. Why would she? She was only the FBI's "intelligence czar" back in 2004, before she left to work for SPARTA, an employee-owned defense contractor of utmost secret- government-like creepiness. Likewise? Not a single reporter has yet come forward to claim attendance.
"We need your help and the nation needs your help," is how the NSA came on to the media-types. And what the reporters got was: Audio- visuals, presentations by historians and a bit of "Top Gun," all while being encouraged to do "innocuous rewrites" of juicy stories in order to protect classified information.
"They had to get permission from the General Counsel to show a segment from the movie," Gerstein told us. "If that doesn't tell you what a button-downed agency this is."
Tom Cruise's pre-Thetan grin was used, according to the course outline, as "a casual demonstration of the multi-faceted global communication structure NSA has charted to collect from." Riiiiiight. No word on whether the tone-deaf agency also provided story time, but we do know the journos had snack: tea and cookies.
"The best way to a reporter's head is through their stomach," Gerstein said. "You wonder what the NSA's budget is for catering; it doesn't look like they even got lunch."
The NSA sees things differently than the average reporter. For instance! As we found with the furor over the New York Times NSA wiretapping stories, they seem to think that terrorists might not already suspect that the U.S. government is observing them?
"The government is convinced that when reporters write a story... that says we intercepted Osama Bin Laden's calls, that we've then let Bin Laden knows that we're listening," said Gerstein. "I mean, [intelligence agencies aren't] idiots; they can carry out an operation. There may be some dumb terrorists who don't know that we're trying to listen to them, but it seems like me if you're a terrorist, it would be a pretty good idea to be paranoid."
Individual reporters attending the sessions were not named in the NSA's documents and Gerstein was unable to confirm who attended, or even whether those reporters were forced to sign confidentiality agreements in order to participate. The resounding silence—so far!— would suggest that they did.
Would Gerstein, who was an ABC White House correspondent before going to work for the Sun, have considered accepting an invitation to spend an afternoon with a bunch of spooks so they could tell him how to do his job? "If the Director of the NSA would sit down with me for 15 minutes on the record, I'd go out and see them for two or three hours on background, sure," he said. "My general rule is that officials who are totally secret... I'm not the kind of person who has a great problem with taking them behind the scenes. But the President should never be off the record. It shouldn't be the case that top-ranking officials are able to influence the news if they're then just going to say 'Oh, that's classified! That's classified!' when you ask them a question on the record."
----
New York Sun - September 27, 2007 <ttp://www.nysun.com/article/63465>
Spies Prep Reporters on Protecting Secrets BY JOSH GERSTEIN - Staff Reporter of the Sun
Frustrated by press leaks about its most sensitive electronic surveillance work, the secretive National Security Agency convened an unprecedented series of off-the-record "seminars" in recent years to teach reporters about the damage caused by such leaks and to discourage reporting that could interfere with the agency's mission to spy on America's enemies.
The half-day classes featured high-ranking NSA officials highlighting objectionable passages in published stories and offering "an innocuous rewrite" that officials said maintained the "overall thrust" of the articles but omitted details that could disclose the agency's techniques, according to course outlines obtained by The New York Sun.
Dubbed "SIGINT 101," using the NSA's shorthand for signals intelligence, the seminar was presented "a handful of times" between approximately 2002 and 2004, an agency spokeswoman, Marci Green, confirmed yesterday. Officials were pleased with the program, she said.
"They believe they were very successful in being able to talk to journalists regarding our mission and the sensitivities of our mission in an unclassified way," Ms. Green said.
The syllabi make clear that the sessions, which took place at NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Md., were conceived of not merely as familiarization tours, but as part of a campaign to limit the damage caused by leaks of sensitive intelligence.
"Course Objective: to convey the fragility of SIGINT and to increase editors' and reporters' understanding that there are other ways to express similar thoughts in an article without compromising the story and without compromising SIGINT," the syllabi said.
The NSA's seminars, delivered over tea and pastries, and accompanied by a clip from "Top Gun," seemed designed to elicit a chummy atmosphere and to highlight commonalities between reporters and the agency's electronic sleuths. "Reporters go to great lengths to protect their sources, as do we," one talking point for the classes said. "We need your help."
Journalists were also treated to technical demonstrations and encouraged to feel that they had gotten a rare behind-the-scenes view of the agency. "Stress that this is the first-ever such course in NSA's history," another talking point said. During one sensitive discussion, journalists were to be told they could not take any notes.
Among the news stories singled out for redrafting by the NSA were an Associated Press rewrite of a 1999 USA Today article by Jack Kelley reporting that officials used a "reconnaissance satellite" to intercept Osama bin Laden's telephone calls and head off six attacks on American embassies, a 1998 Knight Ridder dispatch by Neely Tucker reporting that an "exhaustive review of electronic intercepts of the traffic on bin Laden's communications network" picked up evidence of his involvement in the bombing of American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and a 1998 New York Times story by Steven Lee Myers reporting that a Pentagon warning about a possible attack on American interests in the Persian Gulf was prompted by "eavesdropping on conversations between Mr. bin Laden" and his cohorts.
The exact substitutions of language that the NSA proposed were deleted from the syllabi released to the Sun under the Freedom of Information Act. The agency did leave in the caveat that it was "neither confirming nor denying the accuracy" of the reports it used as examples.
Mr. Tucker, the author of the Knight Ridder story, said in an interview yesterday that he was never invited to the course and never knew the NSA had a problem with the report. "Nobody ever said a word," he said. Mr. Tucker, who now writes for the Washington Post, noted that he was in Africa at the time and that the passage probably originated with another reporter in Washington.
Told of his involvement in the NSA seminar, he said, "Always glad to help NSA any way I can."
Mr. Myers did not respond to a phone message yesterday seeking comment. Mr. Kelley, who quit USA Today in 2004 amid a probe into fabricated stories, could not be reached.
Ms. Green said the program stopped in late 2004 due to staffing changes at the NSA's public affairs operation.
In 2005, following the publication of a New York Times story on a secret program for warrantless wiretapping of some phone calls placed or received in America, the Bush administration's attitude toward leaks became far more confrontational. Director of Central Intelligence Porter Goss crusaded against leaks at the CIA and later told a Senate committee that he hoped reporters would be called before grand juries to identify their sources. Attorney General Gonzales also discussed the "possibility" of prosecuting journalists who wrote stories based on leaked intelligence.
The syllabi, which are marked as drafts, list presenters including the director of the NSA at the time, General Michael Hayden, the agency's general counsel, Robert Deitz, and the head of the signals intelligence division, Maureen Baginski.
Ms. Baginski, who left NSA in 2003 and is now in the private sector, said yesterday that she had no recollection of making such a presentation. Told of the rewriting element of the class, she chuckled and said, "It's an interesting approach."
The Sun obtained the syllabi in response to a Freedom of Information Act request regarding an investigation into leaks about NSA intercepts that may have presaged the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The released course materials contain no obvious reference to those leaks, but they may have been mentioned in portions of the syllabus the NSA deleted from the released copy.