> And that is entirely constitutional as long as there
> is a conceivable valid secular purpose.
It sounds like the legal avenue isn't very promising for connecting these campaigns to a violation of church-state separation. It would be interesting if some lawyer(s) found a way to connect these things.
Meanwhile, free speech campaigners can still frame these anti-adult business campaigns as a religious use of the state to enforce morality on other adults.
And since when are bondage clubs called "parlors"? Wouldn't "dungeon" be the more appropriate term? ;-)
Chuck