[lbo-talk] Idealists and Materialists (was fight within Respect)

Yoshie Furuhashi critical.montages at gmail.com
Mon Oct 22 21:32:50 PDT 2007


On 10/22/07, Lenin's Tomb <leninstombblog at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
> > Omigod, haven't you been keeping up? Islam is like the new
> > Fourth International or something.
>
> This is a preposterous slander.

Islam is the only medium of effective internationalism that can resist the empire on the front line of the Great Game of the 21st century: an energy hunt in the context of the declining dollar hegemony. Secular leftists have become decisively marginalized in nations of the MENA region, and secular leftists elsewhere, even those in Latin America, lack transnational infrastructure that Muslims have built over time to move money, manpower, hardware, and software for resistance in the region. Ironically, it is "idealists," Muslims, who have material means to combat the empire in its chosen battlefield, whereas in most cases "materialists," secular leftists, have only ideas. Muslims alone can only resist and cannot prevail, however. In the end, everything depends on the Russians and the Chinese, "materialists" of another category altogether. -- Yoshie <http://montages.blogspot.com/>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list