[lbo-talk] letter to the editor

[Michael Smith]

On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 11:36 -0700, Robert Wrubel wrote:
> But what difference does it make whether Bush is
> stupid or not?  What difference did it make that
> Clinton was glib? Reagan was even stupider than Bush,
> verbally, and he accomplished far more for the right
> than Bush has.  Bush is merely finishing off the job
> Reagan started. 

... and Clinton continued. Or perhaps we should say the 
job Nixon started, Carter continued, Reagan accelerated, 
Bush I and Clinton kept humming, etc.