Yikes!
1. Define "pseudo" in "pseudo-populism"! What other kinds of populism are available to understand this term by contrast.
2. Atheism != freedom from superstition. And luxury (the word I used) != advantage. And if we are on definitions, lets define "superstition" and why all of it is a bad thing?
3. There is nothing wrong with being educated. Who doubts the value of education? Not me in the passage above.
4. Explain "faux populist pose"?
Hell, if you guys were really over-educated you might even have figured out #2 and #3. ;-) The point, which I bet you already knew while constructing the strawmen ;-), is what you do with that education. I am under no misapprehension that there is sadness, emptiness, etc, to being rich (or educated). The essence of my genuine populism is the hope that the average Joe too can become educated and rich like me and sport an atheist pose (faux or otherwise).
Did I offend you terribly with the non-gay white guy reference, perhaps? I apologise. That was intended at the explicitly listed brats (Dennett, Dawkins, Hitchens). There are upstanding specimen to be found among the white male category (or the privileged non-white male category), many on this list!
--ravi