<div>You need to read up on how opium was viewed in the West. That the Chinese rejected opium was seen in Britian as a sign of their backwardness.</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>jim<BR><BR><B><I>andie nachgeborenen &lt;andie_nachgeborenen@yahoo.com&gt;</I></B> wrote:</div>  <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>As Marx certainly knew when he wrote the famous<BR>passage on religion, opium was prohibited in China,<BR>the trade being a capital crime, and it took a war to<BR>force opium down the throats of the Chinese.<BR><BR>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars#From_the_Napier_Affair_through_the_First_Opium_War_.281834.E2.80.931843.29<BR><BR>--- jrdavis <FROM_ALAMUT@YAHOO.COM>wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; Opium was considered a pain reliever and a<BR>&gt; beneficial medicine in the West during Marx's early<BR>&gt; life.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; jim<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Chris Doss <LOOKOVERHERE1@YAHOO.COM>wrote:<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I
 always thought he had in mind not the Opium Wars,<BR>&gt; but the use of opiates as anesthesia and as a<BR>&gt; high-society recreational drug (or did that not<BR>&gt; start<BR>&gt; until later?).<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; --- James Heartfield <BR>&gt; wrote:<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; the 'opium of the people'. Marx was no 'sixties<BR>&gt; &gt; druggy. He thought opium was <BR>&gt; &gt; very bad indeed. The image he had in mind was not<BR>&gt; Wm<BR>&gt; &gt; Burroughs but the opium <BR>&gt; &gt; that the British Empire had used to get the<BR>&gt; Chinese<BR>&gt; &gt; addicted, so they would <BR>&gt; &gt; be forced to give up their tea.<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; In today's circumstances, which is something like<BR>&gt; a<BR>&gt; &gt; slip backwards from the <BR>&gt; &gt; high point of Enlightenment rationality, I can<BR>&gt; &gt; understand the point that the <BR>&gt; &gt; critics of religion are sometimes worse than<BR>&gt; &gt; religion itself. I mean that <BR>&gt; &gt; the
 Nietzsche/Kojeve/Sartre humanism is a<BR>&gt; &gt; disenchantment with humanity that <BR>&gt; &gt; strips out exactly that which is best in Hegelian<BR>&gt; &gt; Geist, the active, <BR>&gt; &gt; subjective side.<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; But if anyone wants to make a Marxist defence of<BR>&gt; &gt; religion they should bear <BR>&gt; &gt; in mind that, like a good Hegelian, Marx would<BR>&gt; think<BR>&gt; &gt; Protestantism superior <BR>&gt; &gt; to catholicism, and catholicism superior to<BR>&gt; Judaism,<BR>&gt; &gt; and all of them <BR>&gt; &gt; superior to Islam, which is plainly a descent into<BR>&gt; &gt; mumbo-jumbo, and all <BR>&gt; &gt; organised religions superior to new age beliefs,<BR>&gt; &gt; with the worship of the <BR>&gt; &gt; Earth mother Gaia at the bottom of any list he<BR>&gt; would<BR>&gt; &gt; be likely to draw up.<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; ___________________________________<BR>&gt;
 &gt;<BR>&gt;<BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Lyubo, bratsy, lyubo, lyubo, bratsy, zhit!<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ËÞÁÎ, ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ÆÈÒÜ!<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;<BR>____________________________________________________________________________________<BR>&gt; Get your own web address. <BR>&gt; Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.<BR>&gt; http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL<BR>&gt; ___________________________________<BR>&gt;<BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; ___________________________________<BR>&gt;<BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>____________________________________________________________________________________<BR>Do you Yahoo!?<BR>Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
 beta.<BR>http://new.mail.yahoo.com<BR>___________________________________<BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>