<div>You need to read up on how opium was viewed in the West. That the Chinese rejected opium was seen in Britian as a sign of their backwardness.</div> <div> </div> <div>jim<BR><BR><B><I>andie nachgeborenen <andie_nachgeborenen@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>As Marx certainly knew when he wrote the famous<BR>passage on religion, opium was prohibited in China,<BR>the trade being a capital crime, and it took a war to<BR>force opium down the throats of the Chinese.<BR><BR>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars#From_the_Napier_Affair_through_the_First_Opium_War_.281834.E2.80.931843.29<BR><BR>--- jrdavis <FROM_ALAMUT@YAHOO.COM>wrote:<BR><BR>> Opium was considered a pain reliever and a<BR>> beneficial medicine in the West during Marx's early<BR>> life.<BR>> <BR>> jim<BR>> <BR>> Chris Doss <LOOKOVERHERE1@YAHOO.COM>wrote:<BR>> <BR>> I
always thought he had in mind not the Opium Wars,<BR>> but the use of opiates as anesthesia and as a<BR>> high-society recreational drug (or did that not<BR>> start<BR>> until later?).<BR>> <BR>> --- James Heartfield <BR>> wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > the 'opium of the people'. Marx was no 'sixties<BR>> > druggy. He thought opium was <BR>> > very bad indeed. The image he had in mind was not<BR>> Wm<BR>> > Burroughs but the opium <BR>> > that the British Empire had used to get the<BR>> Chinese<BR>> > addicted, so they would <BR>> > be forced to give up their tea.<BR>> > <BR>> > In today's circumstances, which is something like<BR>> a<BR>> > slip backwards from the <BR>> > high point of Enlightenment rationality, I can<BR>> > understand the point that the <BR>> > critics of religion are sometimes worse than<BR>> > religion itself. I mean that <BR>> > the
Nietzsche/Kojeve/Sartre humanism is a<BR>> > disenchantment with humanity that <BR>> > strips out exactly that which is best in Hegelian<BR>> > Geist, the active, <BR>> > subjective side.<BR>> > <BR>> > But if anyone wants to make a Marxist defence of<BR>> > religion they should bear <BR>> > in mind that, like a good Hegelian, Marx would<BR>> think<BR>> > Protestantism superior <BR>> > to catholicism, and catholicism superior to<BR>> Judaism,<BR>> > and all of them <BR>> > superior to Islam, which is plainly a descent into<BR>> > mumbo-jumbo, and all <BR>> > organised religions superior to new age beliefs,<BR>> > with the worship of the <BR>> > Earth mother Gaia at the bottom of any list he<BR>> would<BR>> > be likely to draw up.<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > ___________________________________<BR>>
><BR>><BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<BR>> > <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Lyubo, bratsy, lyubo, lyubo, bratsy, zhit!<BR>> <BR>> ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ËÞÁÎ, ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ÆÈÒÜ!<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>><BR>____________________________________________________________________________________<BR>> Get your own web address. <BR>> Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.<BR>> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL<BR>> ___________________________________<BR>><BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<BR>> <BR>> > ___________________________________<BR>><BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>____________________________________________________________________________________<BR>Do you Yahoo!?<BR>Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
beta.<BR>http://new.mail.yahoo.com<BR>___________________________________<BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>