[lbo-talk] London congestion charge

Jordan Hayes jmhayes at j-o-r-d-a-n.com
Wed Apr 9 17:37:20 PDT 2008



> If Tfl is lying and ALG is lying who are we supposed to believe?

The ALG report is from 2003; these numbers have fluctuated a bit, and there was some padding that TfL did by arranging so that major street construction programs were complete around the time the charge began; the numbers for 2004 were much worse.

Read the Wikipedia article; I think it's got a lot of good info in it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_congestion_charge

I think the summary for London is:

- Not much change in congestion - Huge, corrupt, expensive, invasive boondoggle

Recent changes are threatening to invert the whole thing: the zone was made bigger and now far more residents (who get a 90% discount on the fee) are driving again in London after being shut-out for 5 years. The original zone didn't have many residents, it was mostly commercial ...

Here's a nice, vetted summary of changing traffic:

A report by TfL in early 2007 indicated that there were 2.27

traffic delays per kilometre in the original charging zone. This

compared with a figure of 2.3 before the introduction of the

congestion charge.

(whoops!)

After the scheme was introduced they had measured an improvement

in journey times of 0.7 minutes per km, or 30%. This improvement

had decreased to 22% in 2006, and during 2006 congestion levels

had increased so that the improvement, compared to the year before

the scheme, was just 7%.

(whoops!)

TfL explained this as a result of changes to road priorities

within the zone, delays caused by new pedestrian and road user

safety schemes, and, most particularly, a doubling of road works

in the latter half of 2006.[95] (Utilities were encouraged to

complete planned road works in the year proceeding the congestion

charge, so it would appear that the first year of measurement

used for later comparisons would also have been affected by

streetworks to some extent.[96][97])

TfL's report in June 2007 found that the level of traffic of all

vehicle types entering the central Congestion Charge Zone was now

consistently 16% lower in 2006 than the pre-charge levels in

2002.[25] The conservative Bow Group noted that the main effect

occurred after 11 am.[89]

*shrug*

Doesn't seem like a swimming success, does it?

/jordan



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list