those exploited by others they feel to be goofoofs benefitingf at their expense slack off on necesswary labor. This claim embodies some unpleasant but true assumptions about human nature than we may transcend someday, but we deal with the new society as it emerges from the womb of the old, c'est ne pas? I know I will be damned as a captive of the old Puritan Protestant Jewish worj ethic, someone who doesn't realize that policing (I use the word deliberately) contribution is a bad part of bourgeouis society that will be transcended in a better world, that there will be few slackers because enough people will just love to do the dirty and dangerous work while othersenjoy themselves, and that assigning tasks among workers will be a matter of autonomnous agreement ratherthan labor management. Hooey.
--- On Fri, 4/18/08, W. Kiernan <wkiernan at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: W. Kiernan <wkiernan at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] To each according to work
> To: andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com, lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Friday, April 18, 2008, 9:45 PM
> andie nachgeborenen wrote:
> >
> > But if someone wants to sit on the beach
> > and read John Grisham while I take out the
> > garbage and clean up after dinner
>
> What if he wants to read Horace or Gogol or somebody
> respectable like that?
>
> yrs wdk
WBtw, who says Gogol is respectable? Antisemitic pig, defender of the pogromchiki.
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ