> DH wrote:
>
> The word "unionbusting" is reserved mainly for rival
> unions, especially much smaller ones. Bigger rivals are potential
> "partners."
Doug, regarding this issue, you are completely out of touch with reality.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=union-busting+site%3Awalmartwatch.com
> JG writes:
>
> Within the narrow parameters of the organized labor wars and what
> they portend for the distributionist class struggle in the US, I agree
> entirely with Doug, as well as those others who have also rallied
> against the dumbass, disingenuous hysterics of SEIU mouthpieces.
Wait, did you just call me a "dumbass"?
I don't mind being insulted, but could you possibly reach a little deeper and come up with something less befitting an eight-year old?
And "distributionism" is an actual thing, not a word you just made up.
Is it actually what you're talking about?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism