[lbo-talk] Juan Cole on Kirkuk and Iraqi provincial elections

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Thu Aug 7 10:16:33 PDT 2008


http://www.juancole.com/2008/08/parliament-adjourns-with-no-provincial.html

Informed Comment Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Parliament Adjourns with No Provincial Election Law; Arab Tribes Threaten Violence

The Iraqi parliament proved unable to pass a provincial elections law

on Wednesday despite a marathon 4-hour extraordinary session. They

adjourned for the rest of the month. The sticking point was finding an

acceptable formula for holding the elections in the mixed province of

Kirkuk, which is being fought over by Kurds, Turkmen and Arabs. The

failure to pass the law makes it virtually impossible to hold

provincial elections in 2008.

Al-Hayat reports in Arabic that Speaker of the House Mahmud

al-Mashhadani postponed the debate until September 9. A multi-party

working group will continue to work on the problem in the meantime.

Al-Hayat says that the Arab tribal leaders of Kirkuk Province have

threatened violence to "defend the Arab character of the city," which

the Kurdistan Regional Government wants to annex. Shaykh Husayn Ali

al-Juburi, the head of the governing council in Hawija District and

leader of the United Arab Bloc, told the paper, "Arabs have limited

patience," adding, "the Arab tribes in Kirkuk are prepared, and have

the ability, and the reach, in all Iraqi cities." (He means "to commit

violence.")

Al-Hayat also reports that the worsening of the crisis in Kirkuk was a

topic of discussion between President Bashar al-Asad of Syria and

Turkish Prime Minsiter Rejep Tayyip Erdogan as they met at the

presidential palace in Damascus. In a joint communique they urged the

unity of Iraq and the need for security and stability in Iraq." There

were reportedly fears that a failure to resolve the Kirkuk crisis could

lead Iraq to implode.

Al-Zaman gives as one reason for the postponement of the debate to

September was a fear that the Kirkuk issue could lead to an "explosion"

at any moment, with severe security implications for other Iraqi

cities, such as Mosul and those in Diyala province. Al-Zaman also says

that Turkmen and some Arab members of parliament are demanding the

removal of UN negotiator Steffan de Mistura, whon they accuse of bias

(i.e. toward the Kurds). He had suggested that elections in Kirkuk be

postponed while they were held in the rest of the country. The Turkmen

want the elections to be held in Kirkuk at the same time as in the rest

of Iraq.

The elections are important to social peace in Iraq. The January, 2005,

provincial elections were deeply flawed. The Sunni Arabs largely

boycotted them. Only a few party lists had the organization and

experience to contest them effectively-- especially the Islamic Supreme

Council of Iraq, many of whose members had lived in Iran and witnessed

the elections there, which involve a lot of canvassing and sometimes

produce surprise upsets.

Diyala Province, which has a Sunni majority, is ruled by the pro-Tehran

Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq-- a recipe for disaster. Kurds play a

disproportionate role in governing Ninevah, a largely Sunni Arab

province. Al-Anbar Province is dominated by the Sunni fundamentalist

Iraqi Islamic Party, the only one to run in 2005, but only 2% of the

electorate voted. The Dulaim tribal elite and the Awakening Councils

are largely disenfranchised in al-Anbar, which is not a stable

situation. Even the provinces of the Shiite south, which saw good

turnout in 2005, are dominated by the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq,

which ran a good campaign but may no longer be very popular.

Indeed, the lack of enthusiasm for new provincial elections among the

high politicians elected in 2005 can probably be explained in part by

their fear of not running very well and of the rise of challengers,

from the Awakening Councils to the Sadr Movement.

McClatchy quotes a UN official cautioning that if provincial elections

are not held by the end of 2008, they could get postponed until June,

2009.

I am unhappy about the delay in the holding of provincial elections. It

is a step I have been championing for some time, as in my article at

The Nation on "How to Get Out of Iraq" as a preparation for US military

withdrawal. The independent, Durayd Kashmula, cannot rule largely Sunni

Arab Ninevah Province if the US departs it. The Shiite government of

Badr Corps member Ra'ad Hameed Al-Mula Jowad Al-Tamimi, the governor of

Diyala wouldn't last a month if US troops were not around. (The deputy

governor, Awf Rahim, was arrested by US troops last week; that is never

a good sign.)

Even more alarming than the Iraqi parliament's inability to arrange for

provincial elections to be held over 2 years after they were first

scheduled is the reason for the failure. The debate on provincial

elections has revealed that the Kirkuk dispute is a volcano about to

blow, and that ordinary liberal institutions of debate and compromise

seem helpless before the ethno-nationalist passions boiling there.

Resolving Kirkuk is not only key to social peace in northern Iraq but

also in the entire eastern Mediterranean.

<end excerpt>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list