A) The "developmental state" as you describe it is the ahistorical nexus of change in every phase of political-economic development. Certainly it was from feudalism to capitalism.
B) While I certainly believe that there is a post-capitalist developmental state. I just don't see it in the BRIC countries. There, I see the developmental state primarily aimed at the establishment of liberal-democratic and financial capitalist norms - and for good reason: that's where the money is. I see *an* argument that the post-capitalist developmental state might logically arise in the BRIC countries, I just don't find the argument or the evidence persuasive.
C) Call me a doctrinaire stagist if you like, but I accept that "the developmental state is the gateway of 21st century socialism" and that "This is the fundamental reality of contemporary geopolitics." I just don't see any evidence that the BRIC countries are or even should be in the vanguard of that change.
>
> -- DRR
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>