Don't be silly, Doug.
By the way, did anyone note that the Georgian conflict came on the 30th Anniversary of the Soviet deployment into Afghanistan?
I have no idea what that means.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Chris Doss <lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Sort of, if by "the Russians" you mean "investor reaction to an inspectorate visit." Unless Ames has changed his story (which he has done at least once), somebody complained about them "insulting Russia" (my guess is due to some of the racist and misogynistic content) and they got a visit by an inspectorate, which fined them a few hundred bucks. Then supposedly their investors (whoever they are) pulled out. This is info from a month or so ago, so things may have changed in the interrim.
>
> The fact of the matter is that material opposed to the government or various of its policies, somebody very strident opposition, can be bought on any streetcorner. You don't even to know Russian or actually be in Russia to verify this, given that a lot of it gets translated and put on Johnson's Russia List. This is not China. In fact, the article by Pavel Felgenhauer that is serving as the basis for the "it was a Russian trap!" theory of the Georgia conflict was published in Novaya Gazeta.
>
See?
The pipeline (and freedom of the press) are fine. Besides we don't even *want* your stupid pipeline (or freedom of the press). Everything is perfectly fine.
Chris, my question is this: Are you actually writing from inside the Kremlin right now?
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>