On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Michael Pollak <mpollak at panix.com> wrote:
> I'm afraid I think we certainly should not. One big difference between now
> and then is that is that it's easier to show that an ad is a fake. And an ad
> that's proven fraudulent generates huge amounts of bad feelings for your
> cause -- especially if it involves the manipulation of pictures. (Fake
> quotes are more robust, but without pictures, I don't think this one in this
> context would have much effect.)