On Dec 14, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
> He was a curious guy who liked to figure things out, perhaps. Like
> many of us, though smarter than most. But he didn't believe -- did
> he? --
> that argument -- still less, moral argument -- was going to dethrone
> the bourgeoisie and bring about -- what?
Of course not. What's that line about between two such adversaries only might prevails? But really, why go to all that trouble if you didn't have an ethical beef with capitalism?
Doug