On Dec 21, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Since, as you are fond of pointing out, there is no "left" in any
> coherent sense, there is no "we" to plug into this passage, then
> there will be no "we" to officiate at the receivership hearings.
There will of course be a 'we'. What you're saying is that it won't be a left 'we'.
I'd love to see some discussion of which 'we' will serve as the banker/ lawyer. Isn't it happening right now?
martin