On Dec 25, 2008, at 10:48 PM, Eubulides wrote:
> Ex cathedra grammatical entertainment of some of CC's claims aside;
> why the
> disparagement of utterly understandable and respectable metaethical
> skepticism in matters of political economy? This
> from someone who likes to make fun of moralism, as if there wasn't
> enough paradox and paralogy in those moves [Wall Street p. 2-9 for
> starters] to make for an interesting subthread
Moralism isn't the same as having a morality, just as sentimentality isn't the same as having emotions.