[lbo-talk] Unproductive labor

Charles Brown charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Wed Feb 13 12:45:31 PST 2008



>>> Eubulides >>>
On Feb 13, 2008 11:08 AM, Carrol Cox
>
> andie nachgeborenen wrote:
> >
> > One political reason I don't like the p/u labor
> > distinction is that emotionally it seems to line up in
> > people's minds with p=good, necessary, justified,
> > would exist under socialism, u= bad, wasteful,
>
> So using it politically (regardless of its theoretical validity or
> invalidity) is as silly as using quantum mechanics to determine the
> proper oven temperature for a lamb roast.
>
> Carrol

=====================

Uh, no. The political/theory divide re validity is *much* more problematic than is the case you analogize to habitually.

There's a reason they call it political economy after all................

Ian

^^^^

"The question whether objective truth can be attributed to human thinking is not a question of theory but is a practical question. Man (sic) must prove the truth — i.e. the reality and power, the this-sidedness of his thinking in practice. The dispute over the reality or non-reality of thinking that is isolated from practice is a purely scholastic question."

- Big Daddy



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list