obviously you did not read the whole website. Obama is the only candidate humane enough to recognize the humanitarian crisis of the Iraqi people and he is the only one looking for a diplomatic solution to the regional crisis. He has also spoken against first strike threats against terrorist sites. The differences are so massive that I am bewildered by the constant attempts to deny them. What's getting in the way of seeing the obvious, real differences? Is it fetishism of structure which reduces all candidates to a single puppet role--that is, really bad social theory? Let it be clear: Cox purposefully distorted Obama's statements to make it seem as if no difference in principle has beeen articulated. This should not be allowed. Abu Hartal _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/