I think you misread my analogy. When I wrote "Different things that kill by nearly identical means." I meant there are differences between fascism and US authoritarianism just as there is between a gun and a knife. It is the wound inflicted; a hole in the heart, that is where the similarity lies. In other words the suckiness for the average citizen is pretty equal under either regime. I don't see a great deal of difference for most people living under one vs. the other. I also don't see much difference in opposition at the grass-roots level to either regime. Again, how does one fight creeping fascism differently than one does US authoritarianism? What strategies apply to opposing one but not the other? I'm open to the idea that there may be fundamental differences in the strategies one might employ to fight creeping fascism rather than US style authoritarianism but I've never seen anyone explain the how and/or why of those differences. Without articulating those differences, and explaining them in a convincing manner, the idea that there is an actual threat in mislabeling US authoritarianism as fascism rings hollow. I agree they are different but I disagree that failing to properly note the difference constitutes a threat in itself.
John Thornton