>From his web site, which you evidently neglected to visit before issuing your assortment of pronunciamentos.
>Unlike Edwards Obama will not state that privatizing SS is NOT part of
>his agenda which means he will likely support such a plan if he deems it
>politically expedient. I don't know why Max states that Obama is against
>privatizing SS. Max, if you have something from Obama specifically
>claiming he opposes privatizing SS I'd like to see it.
>While I agree with Max that a health care system funded from general
>revenue is best if not that then it must be mandated to work. Obamas
>plan sucks worse than Edwards for that reason just as I said earlier.
>Obama has been unable to get any national union support, unlike Edwards,
>and has again adopted Republican talking point on labor issue so while
>it may be going to far to state he is anti-union there is no evidence he
>is pro-union that I know of except his vote for the Employee Free Choice
>Act. Something many Republicans supported so it doesn't exactly
>demonstrate much of anything that I can see.
>If someone wants to claim all three Dems suck I'm with them on that but
>if they want to claim that Obama is no different than Edwards then I
>believe they are mistaken and I invite them to demonstrate how they came
>to that conclusion.
>Truthfully the complaints Kuchinich claims he has with Edwards hold
>equally or more true for Obama so at the very least he is being
>disingenuous with his claims.
>
>John Thornton
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk