The first is to be expected isn't it? After all the animosity heaped on the Clinton's by the Repugs. The falling behind/getting ahead isn't surprising either. One thing I have wondered is that since non-rigorous polls tend to mask negative racial opinions is this fact reflected in the weighted adjustments for these Presidential polls or is this unimportant when showing preferences for candidates? Put another way, how likely is it that people will claim they are going to support a black candidate to mask their negative racial opinions? Could this explain some of the apparent higher support for Obama over Hillary in NH polls when in actuality Hillary won? Has this been raised at AAPOR?
John Thornton