I'm in a good mood tonight, so if you clarify just what the hell your enigmatic, six-word post below means, I'll think about it.
On Jan 13, 2008 10:50 AM, <bitch at pulpculture.org> wrote:
> At 06:56 PM 1/12/2008, Joseph Catron wrote:
> >Two for one:
> >
> >On Jan 12, 2008 6:27 PM, <bitch at pulpculture.org> wrote:
> >
> > > *rolls eyes* not you too? ugh.
> >
> >It depends on what you mean, about which I cannot be realistically
> >expected to have an idea, but I'm guessing the answer is "no."
> >
> >However, trotting out a pornographic enterprise to denounce a
> >political opponent for his supposed excessive religiosity is just
> >silly.
>
> just silly isn't an argument. ....waiting....