[lbo-talk] Neo-Lamarckianism???? Come on!

Charles Brown charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Mon Jan 14 13:28:51 PST 2008


But they didn't. The first known "birds" are from the Jurassic, tens of millions of years prior to the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous.

^^^^ CB: Of course, those "birds" probably still arose relatively rapidly but just during the Jurassic. You have "birds" in quotes. Are you talking about beings that were the same species as modern birds ? It makes a big difference here. I doubt what you refer to are the same species as modern birds. Probably some other flying species.

Whenever, they started up there will be a time when they are absent from the fossil record and then "suddenly" they are in the fossil record.

--- Charles Brown <charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us> wrote:
>
> I think you might be saying that the evidence of
> LaMarckianism might
> be that the bird species arise _relatively_ rapidly.
>

____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list