[lbo-talk] Neo-Lamarckianism???? Come on!

Chris Doss lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 14 22:45:51 PST 2008


--- "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at uiuc.edu> quoted:
> >
> > At least since Parmenides it has been well known
> that this question
> > cannot be asked (ie., is meaningless) because one
> of its dichotomous
> > possibilities (there is something/there is
> nothing) is
> > selfcontradictory. *Nothing* cannot exist.

Don't forget -- it is also well-known that the universe is an internally undifferentiated sphere, and motion does not exist!

C.G., you are sparring with pig ignorance. Give up!

____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list