[lbo-talk] Neo-Lamarckianism???? Come on!

Charles Brown charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Wed Jan 30 13:32:23 PST 2008



>>> <RicardoStarkey

On Thu Jan 17, Shane Mage wrote:


> Meaningless "questions" like "Why is there something instead of
> nothing?" cannot yield a meaningful answer to scientific, or any
other,
> technique.

There are many scientists who would disagree with you about that. They're called "nothing theorists" and they think about exactly this

question.

I'm currently reading a book written for the layperson (but still rather difficult to understand) on this very subject. It's pretty mindblowing. The basic answer to the question is that nothing is too unstable to exist for long, so that particles would inevitably be created.

^^^^^ CB: There was a political party of these scientists in the US in the 1800's: The Knownothing Party

^^^^^

_The Hole in the Universe: How Scientists Peered over the Edge of Emptiness and Found Everything_ by K. C. Cole

**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.

http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list