Nobody claims that they are true claims about the nature of reality as it is in itself, given that reality as it is in itself is never encountered by anyone.
--- On Thu, 7/3/08, Ted Winslow <egwinslow at rogers.com> wrote:
>
> Given that it's possible to figure out what they mean
> in themselves,
> what grounds are there for believing that the claims are
> "knowledge"
> in the sense of true claims about the nature of reality as
> it is in
> itself?
>
> Ted
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk