>Movements have goals and a sense of structure, and I don't think the
>progressive blogosphere, while mighty and growing, really achieves that in
>any substantial sense. But that's why I think it's strong, because it's
>more like an uprising. It's a moment in history where the real silent
>majority speaks up, and lo and behold, they're liberals. I think this is
>better than a movement, because movements tend to fall apart after certain
>goals are met, but a shift in the zeitgeist has more permanence.
aside from the general hilarity of this statement, i was having a tee hee over the slippage: progressive blogsophere ... lo and behold, they're liberals.
from pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/netroots_nation_doneness/
title's good too: done, as in stick a fork in it.
http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)