The first impact of an economic crisis is to send everyone scurry8ing for individual salvation and only a few under those conditions will be attracted to collective struggle. Probably, however, an existing local left group could/should increase slightly its size and its experience. But when even an illusory recovery begins, then there is always the possiblity of real advance. It took ten years or more of economic growth for the black movement to really get underway, and everything else in the '60s was an outgrowth of that movement.
Carrol
Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> Actually, an impending crisis should be a signal for radicals to bear down & get to
> work to be able to make a contribution during the chaos.
How? Get to work doing what? With what resources?
Carrol
>
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 09:54:57AM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> >
> > I've said this many times, but that's never stopped me from saying it
> > again. If the left project is so dependent on crisis to do our
> > polemical work for us, then we're doomed. If we can't convince people
> > that the normal operation of capitalism is unjust, violent,
> > alienating, polarizing, etc., then we might as well give up. Because
> > crises do resolve themselves, but the rest goes on. The "normal"
> > should be the issue, not the extraordinary.
> >
>
> --
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA 95929
>
> Tel. 530-898-5321
> E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
> michaelperelman.wordpress.com
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk