>>> Angelus Novus
_Capital_ isn't anything Marx wrote? Wow, since when did this become the ML/Diamat orthodoxy? I assume some sort of "ghostwriter" theory is now the correct line?
Engels certainly created a lot of mischief with his editing of the second and third volumes, but I wasn't aware that Marx's authorship was itself at issue!
^^^^^ CB: No , it's that your posts to this list don't represent _Capital_ accurately, whereas mine do and ,I prove it by posting quotes from _Capital_; which I have done on at least one occasion clearly contradicting something you asserted with Marx's words from _Capital_. ( lets go to the archives)
Phony Angelic Marxists like you have nothing in common with _Capital_.
(And the only way you can respond adequately is by quoting _Capital_ ha ha ha , you little non-quoting angel)
This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. www.surfcontrol.com