On the call center issue, we got the idea from Australia -- and I don't understand this well at all -- when unions in that country were forced to related to their members after the loss of agency shop (dues checkoff?) under labor law reform a few years ago. In SEIU it's seen (by some -- not all of course) as a way to provide increased services to members given the amount of resources -- 50% -- we devote to new organizing. No other union comes close, btw. Implicitly or explicitly many of the "SEIU dissidents" would have the union spend more money on servicing members instead of organizing the unorganized.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 2:39 PM, MICHAEL YATES <mikedjyates at msn.com> wrote:
>
> In their new book, "Solidarity Divided," Bill Fletcher and Fernando Gapasin sharply
> criticize the SEIU approach to building a labor movement and they have caustic words
> for Andrew Stern. Have the SEIU stalwarts on this list seen this book? Fletcher and Gapasin
> are not outside academics. They have been intimately involved in organized labor at all levels for
> more than 30 years. The chapter in their book titled "Change to Win," is subtitled "A Return to
> Gompers?"
>
> Michael Yates
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>