>That piece of Palast's was deeply stupid. On a minor point, he
>doesn't seem to know the difference between a Carlyle fund and the
Carlyle Group.
Yeah, doesn't the latter only own like 15% of the former? And the Group is in no way in peril becaues of this.
Apparently, Palast thinks skimming New York Times articles amounts to research. At least skim the Financial Times.