Indeed. From:
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20080303/004703.html
I wrote:
>
>On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:59:19PM -0500, Doug Henwood wrote:
>
>> But she's ahead now in the polls and there are more primaries
>> ahead.
>> Why should BHO be the presumptive nominee, other than because you
>> like him better?
>
>Well, if one believes the following:
>
>* Obama is much more electable than Hillary, because Clinton-hate is
> so strong amongst right-wingers and some independents. Those voters
> may stay home, or vote for Obama. But they'll come out and vote for
> McCain.
>
>* A McCain presidency would be an order of magnitude more horrible for
> the entire world than either Obama or Clinton.
>
>Then it follows that one would want Hillary to step out.
>
>There's really nothing new here. The "spoiler" argument is why some
>people don't want Nader to run, and didn't want him to run in the
>past.
>
>
>Matt
Matt
-- PGP RSA Key ID: 0x1F6A4471 aim: beyondzero123 PGP DH/DSS Key ID: 0xAFF35DF2 yahoo msg: beyondzero123 http://blogdayafternoon.com
We cannot separate the air that chokes from the air upon which wings beat.
-John Perry Barlow