On May 14, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Robert Wrubel wrote:
> I can't let this statement go unnoticed! And while there is a
> shocking contrarian truth to it, like many of your comments,
> Carrol, I wonder what we use in place of "working class" when we
> are thinking about how to produce radical social change?
What about the old ciass in itself/class for itself distinction. One needn't be conscious of one's class position to be part of a class.