oh. the netroots. not. they were opposed to the guy early on and didn't even get on board until feb 2007. netroots signed up after the fact. that I know because i hate the netroots twitshits. slimebags.
i'm thrilled to death about the fact that they have turned out the be the whiney little worthless fuckstains in terms of the awesome power!
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20080505/008044.html and http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20080505/008047.html <quote> Lo and behold, they aren't the largest constituency in the Democratic Party. They aren't even the largest constituency online.
[snip]
The core reason for Jerome's alienation is that the netroots are losing a battle for relevance to a bunch of Obama-supporting, Facebook-addled college kids. When the second quarter closes, it will probably be announced that Obama has raised at least $15 million online, three times what Dean did at this point last cycle, and about twice Edwards' total. Obama has done it with some netroots support, but the not inconsiderable difference between him and Edwards is due to a cult of personality that matters far more than anyone's support on the blogs. </quote>