>Does this really make sense? The pro-choice movement never really
>built a movement - it was all about lobbying and litigation,
>punctuated by quadrennial pleas to vote Dem because of the Supreme
>Fucking Court. With this passing with a 52-48 margin, and a lot of the
>opposition concentrated among older voters, wouldn't it make more
>sense to organize rather than litigate?
>
>Doug
What's that line you quote from Boll? "Action is being taken" or something like that?
This is Nader politics. It doesn't just take steam out of organizing, it displaces it.