[lbo-talk] and you thought the DLC was dead?

[Max B. Sawicky]

shag wrote:
> At 10:21 AM 11/8/2008, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
>> . . . the nattering nabobs of negativism . . .
> 
> does that mean you think the DLC is a good thing? If so, why?
> 
> shag

Unlike El Busho, the new occupant of the WH is not a dummy.  He is actually
interested in domestic policy, and he is going to be in charge, not the DLC.

The DLC is not some cabal plotting its next move.  It's a membership list
of moderate-to-conservative Dems and a think tank with some not very
consequential figures.  The new Administration is much bigger and broader
than the DLC.