> In other words, they are arguing for a fence that steals less
> territory. They aren't even explicitly calling for it to to track the
> Green Line. Just that it should not go "deep."
Their press release says: "Peace Now demands: a fence on the green line! The Sharon government fence is dangerous and destroys any chance for a political agreement!"
> I think you overestimate Peace Now's radicalness.
Advocating a fence along the Green Line isn't very radical. I don't think Emanuel would ever dare to criticize the fence.
SA