Paul is a whole other bag of worms. Hearing all these people who think he's so enlightened--Andrew Sullivan on Bill Maher the other day, all over the goo-goo-ga-ga libertarian webscape like the Mises blog--it just baffles the mind. It actually makes me think that the point Woj never tires of making about the misaligned obsession of the 60s left---hitting the re-set button on the whole social formation, but without a real sense of what would replace it--has come back with a vengance, only this time with none of the actual leftist content. The only thing, as you point out, that remains of that movement on a large scale, is its performative cultural elements--Soviet constructivist lettering, paeans to revolution, etc. On the other hand, it seems to attract none of the equivalent hipster elements and instead has vaulted a whole contingent of geeky, almost wonky adherents who never tire of telling you of how wonderfully pragmatic their utopian fantasy would be. Here the boundary between this being an absolutely natural phenomenon and it needing the kind of careful planning--pace cool planning a la J. R. R. Tolkien's hobbit languages not Lenin's central planning--moves fairly fluidly depending on needs of speaker at the moment. It would be sad if they weren't such useful idiots for the proto-fascists.
s
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:13 PM, B. <docile_body at yahoo.com> wrote:
> ...have been shown on the news with an inordinate amount of Ron Paul signs and banners.
>
> Any fellow Austinites noticed this? That the weird Austin "enlightened yuppie," spoiled college kid element here is still very much pro-Ron Paul and are the ones on the Capitol steps, with their bullhorns, getting the local media coverage against the bailout?
>
> They even have a huge banner with Paul's face painted on it in that Soviet Constructivist visual style, with the "rEVOLution" slogan on it. Still holding on to the dream....
>
> -B.