for some, it was obviously that the bailout was crap because it wasn't radical enough. we should have used this as an opportunity to force wall st types and their lackeys in congress to make important changes to the system that would redistribute wealth downward.
for some, it was that we shouldn't support the bailout because we should allow the crisis to happen and this would provide fertile grounds for radical social change.
what were some other arguments?
thanks.
shag
http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)