On Oct 4, 2008, at 1:59 PM, shag wrote:
> for some, it was that we shouldn't support the bailout because we
> should allow the crisis to happen and this would provide fertile
> grounds for radical social change.
>
> what were some other arguments?
If corporate (financial) institutions accept the fiction of personhood shouldn't they be allowed to learn from their mistakes? That would be the best I could expect from saying 'no', although it doesn't seem too radical.
xx, martin