On 04/10/2008, shag <shag at cleandraws.com> wrote:
> i was following the conversations, but i never got a good handle on why
> people were opposed to the bailout. i am trying to see if i can sum of the
> various classes of argument, and you can correct me:
>
> for some, it was obviously that the bailout was crap because it wasn't
> radical enough. we should have used this as an opportunity to force wall st
> types and their lackeys in congress to make important changes to the system
> that would redistribute wealth downward.
>
> for some, it was that we shouldn't support the bailout because we should
> allow the crisis to happen and this would provide fertile grounds for
> radical social change.
>
> what were some other arguments?