[lbo-talk] question for those opposed to the bailout

Jordan Hayes jmhayes at j-o-r-d-a-n.com
Mon Oct 6 07:00:18 PDT 2008


Dmytri writes:


> "Bailout" or not, the only way any "owner-occupiers" who fall
> behind on their mortgages are not kicked out is if the potential
> repossessor realizes that the property is a white-elephant and
> concludes racking the existing occupier will be more profitable
> than the market-return for repossessing the property.

Well, sure. Win-win, right?

Looks like some of that is starting to happen ...

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081006/mortgage_lawsuit.html?.v=9

Bank of America settles suits over bad mortgages

Bank of America unit to modify loans to help keep people in their homes

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) -- Facing a lawsuit over deceptive mortgage practices, Bank of America Corp. is agreeing to pay more than $8 billion to modify hundreds of thousands of loans to keep people from losing their homes.

Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America said Monday it will modify troubled mortgages with up to $8.4 billion in interest rate and principal reductions for nearly 400,000 customers of Countrywide Financial Corp., the troubled mortgage lender it acquired last summer.

[ ... ]



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list