[lbo-talk] Endgame in the banking sector

Eubulides paraconsistent at comcast.net
Sun Sep 14 19:50:52 PDT 2008


Shane Mage wrote:
> But the article is entirely concerned with the case for or against
> "rule-based" open-market operations by the fed. Not a word can be
> used to justify the intervention in markets adopted by the Bushits in
> response to the current crisis.
>
================

If he were consistently laissez-faire he'd argue against open market operations by the Fed; whether by rules or discretion it's an utterly activist strategy, duh. <http://www.fmcenter.org/site/pp.aspx?c=8fLGJTOyHpE&b=2278485&printmode=1> [See notes on District 8]


>> Laissez-faire is utterly incoherent, duh.
>
> No, laissez-faire is completely coherent, just like any other utopian
> ideology. It's just utterly inconsistent with the realities of
> imperialism and state/monopoly capitalism.
>
>
> Shane Ma.ge
==================

Well I don't buy the apriori/empirical distinction your assertion presupposes and stand by my claim. I'm not in the habit of gabbing with misogynists so I'll let you have the final word.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list